Installing OpenCV 3.1 for Python on MacOSX Sierra

Originally developed by Intel, OpenCV is a real-time computer vision programming library available for cross-platform usage. The library is cross-platform and free for use under the open-source BSD license.

“It has C++, C, Python and Java interfaces and supports Windows, Linux, Mac OS, iOS and Android. OpenCV was designed for computational efficiency and with a strong focus on real-time applications. Written in optimized C/C++, the library can take advantage of multi-core processing. Enabled with OpenCL, it can take advantage of the hardware acceleration of the underlying heterogeneous compute platform. Adopted all around the world, OpenCV has more than 47 thousand people of user community and estimated number of downloads exceeding 14 million. Usage ranges from interactive art, to mines inspection, stitching maps on the web or through advanced robotics.”
— OpenCV Org.

OpenCV, despite being powerful is slightly intimidating for beginners due to its slightly long installation procedure. I’m writing this simple guide to get started with OpenCV 3.1 for Python on MacOSX Sierra to simplify the setup process. Feel free to leave suggestions in the comments.

For this installation, I will be using Anaconda (Python Distribution and Package Manager) which is simple, to begin with. I’m using Anaconda 4.4.0 for MacOSX with Python 3.6 on my computer.

While Anaconda comes with major scientific Python modules, it doesn’t come with the OpenCV module. But OpenCV module (unofficial) is available on few Anaconda package channels. We’re here going to use Menpo/OpenCV 3.1 to install OpenCV.

Note. While the latest stable release of OpenCV is 3.2 (as I’m writing this) but OpenCV 3.2 is not available for x64 channels on Anaconda. Hence, we will be using 3.1 here.

Step 1. Open Terminal and create a new Python environment.

conda create -yn opencvtest python=3.5

Make sure that you use Python 3.5 with OpenCV 3.1, Python 3.6 produces some incompatibilities. The ‘opencvtest’ is the name of the new environment which can be anything else also.

Step 2. Switch environment

source activate opencvtest

Get into the new environment to install OpenCV and use it.

Step 3. Install OpenCV module

conda search -c menpo --spec 'opencv=3*'

You may search for available builds for the OpenCV module and install the desired one. For this guide, as I said earlier I will be going to use OpenCV 3.1.

conda install -y -c menpo opencv=3.1

This will install the OpenCV 3.1 and its dependencies and you’re now ready to use the OpenCV.

You may now test a simple OpenCV program. The below program uses Haar Cascade classifiers to detect any human faces and eyes and draws a rectangle on the input image.

import numpy as np
import cv2

face_cascade = cv2.CascadeClassifier('path/to/haarcascade_frontalface_default.xml')
eye_cascade = cv2.CascadeClassifier('path/to/haarcascade_eye.xml')

img = cv2.imread('image.jpg')
gray = cv2.cvtColor(img, cv2.COLOR_BGR2GRAY)

faces = face_cascade.detectMultiScale(gray, 1.3, 5)
for (x,y,w,h) in faces:
    roi_gray = gray[y:y+h, x:x+w]
    roi_color = img[y:y+h, x:x+w]
    eyes = eye_cascade.detectMultiScale(roi_gray)
    for (ex,ey,ew,eh) in eyes:

Harr-Cascade – Face Detection Example | Photo by Mike Wilson on Unsplash

Hope this will be useful for beginners who want to use OpenCV into their programs.

Prime Numbers: The Building Blocks

For as long as I remember, I always had a deep interest in prime numbers. And for that, this certainly makes the cut to be the first post here. As I’m writing the first post, I’m unsure about the tone and content of this blog in future, but would like it to not just have research notes but also about my first-hand experiences.

Prime Numbers are the building blocks of the numbers and perhaps the processes of the Universe, as I like to think. They indeed have occult properties and some very profound applications in science and nature. However simple their definition may be, we still do not have a formula for it. I find the fundamental theorem of arithmetic fairly straightforward and the fact that only primes can not be expressed as the product of other (positive natural) numbers, is a very intuitive implication that I think even non-mathematicians would be able to understand. Prime makes the composite numbers. But, what are primes made up of? Are prime numbers the result of how we framed the rules of Maths to be? Or did it always existed? Well whether or not if it is real, it has irrespectively awakened my curiosity to study it and perhaps define a formula. How can something that appears simple and yet not understood entirely? Aren’t primes transcendental?

That being said, I’m sometimes put down by imagining the incredible literature available on the Prime numbers, which is already studied for more than 2000 years. The earliest surviving records come from the Ancient Greeks! Imagine what could be possibly appealing about these numbers for the ancient Greeks? What might have been their motivations?

The sieve of Eratosthenes is one of the ways to find all of the smaller primes. It is named after Eratosthenes of Cyrene, a Greek mathematician.

“There are two facts about the distribution of prime numbers of which I hope to convince you so overwhelmingly that they will be permanently engraved in your hearts. The first is that, despite their simple definition and role as the building blocks of the natural numbers, the prime numbers grow like weeds among the natural numbers, seeming to obey no other law than that of chance, and nobody can predict where the next one will sprout. The second fact is even more astonishing, for it states just the opposite: that the prime numbers exhibit stunning regularity, that there are laws governing their behavior, and that they obey these laws with almost military precision”.D. Zagier at a lecture (1975)

Intrinsically, I looked for the hidden visual model but never could able to get past any existing research. It is incredibly distracting as it appears to follow an unknown rule. Prime numbers have indisputably kept me occupied for many years now. And with the computers we have now, it is probably going to be the very exciting era for mathematical research and a significant leap is not so far away.

I began looking at the sequence and what a fantastic puzzle this is! The distribution despite following a rule does not let us pinpoint the next occurrence of prime. Is Mathematics advance enough to write the solution? Or it will remain in the class of hard problems which cannot be otherwise solved by non-brute force approach.

“Mathematicians have tried in vain to this day to discover some order in the sequence of prime numbers, and we have reason to believe that it is a mystery into which the mind will never penetrate”.

A prime number is a positive integer p>1 that has no positive integer divisors other than 1 and p itself. And a method for determining whether a number is prime or not is called as Primality Test.


While it’s quite simple to identify small prime numbers, the problem appears when number grow large as it then needs to be checked far more times to decide its primality. To start with, trial division is the simplest method to test primality where given number is checked for its divisibility by numbers smaller than itself. function

Lets consider function ω(x) which represents the number of distinct prime factors of x [3], which can be defined as —


With this,  set P can be now rewritten as (for the sake of understanding the implementation) —


This can be implemented (in Python) to write primality test as —

def omega(x):
    distinct_factors = 0
    for i in range(x):
        if x%i == 0:
            distinct_factors += 1
    return distinct_factors

def is_prime(x):
    if x == 1:
        return False
    if omega(x)==2:
        return True
    return False

This is of course not efficient. The algorithm takes at least x steps to conclude primality. The omega(x) keeps counting the distinct_factors even after exceeding 2, which is not necessary because it already means that the given number is COMPOSITE. To remove those extra steps, we can rewrite the definition of P where we no longer count the ω(x) but check if x is divisible by all the positive integers more than 1 and lesser than x. In fact, the definition will still build the same set but only be implemented in a different way.


def is_prime(x):
    if x == 1:
        return False
    for i in range(2,x):
        if x%i == 0:
            return False
    return True

Now by removing 1 and going only till x-1, we can conclude as soon as we find any number perfectly dividing the x, without actually keeping track of factor count.



The implementation will now have a much lesser running time.

def is_prime(x):
    if x == 1:
        return False
    for i in range(2,sqrt(x)):
        if x%i == 0:
            return False
    return True

My coding style is largely influenced and driven by Mathematics and in my opinion, this makes it much easier to implement. In future, I wish to write and create artifacts for illustrating the parallels largely between Mathematics and Coding for – demystifying coding for math enthusiasts and exercise coding to improve myself.


  1. Havil, Julian (2003), Gamma: Exploring Euler’s Constant, Princeton University Press, ISBN 978-0-691-09983-5
  2. Riesel Hans. Prime numbers and computer methods for factorization, 1994.